Comment on the three parts of sociological theories, explain and argue, establish on your depository library or Internet research, which type of system is the most appropriate theory for sociology to adopt. The three global types of sociological theory are positively charged, interpretive and overcritical theory. In determining which theory is the most appropriate for sociology to adopt, a prefatorial understanding of separately theorys strengths and weaknesses is necessary. In defining each of these theories, it is important to square up the ontological stern or the theorys basis for determining what is cognoscible; the epistemological basis or the theorys relationship between the knower and the knowable; and, finally, the methodological basis or the theorys method for gathering data and obtaining knowledge. A. POSITIVISTIC 1. Ontology. The positivistic theory is based on an ontology of being a realist. The lifelike slant of incontrovertibleness is also known as determinism. The positivist knows that a realism is protrude there to be be and categorized. The hard sciences from the time of Newton and Decartes have traditionally relied on the positivistic nestle. The positivist hopes to be able to approximate body politic in a detailed generalization or theory on how reality operates. The theories of a positivist generally regard the form of cause and effect laws describing the away reality. Robert Merton defined these theorems as clear verifiable statements of the relationships between specified variables. 2. Epistemology. Positivism relies on an objective epistemology. The perceiver remains distant and does not interact with the observation or experiment.
Values and some(prenominal) other factors that might pop off to bias are to be carefully removed so that the cold, monological gaze of science fag end be utilise to analyze the data. The positivist is an objectivist. 3. Methodology. The methodology of positivism is experimental and manipulative. The show up is the same as propounded... Great! This is what im actually talking approximately considering the content and the worldly presented! The way it is presented here is not practically satisfactory that that might be because of another reason. (no relevance to the essay) I rattling liked the way you answered the question step by step. The golf links were pretty strong from paragraph to paragraph. I did not respect any run on sent ences which is total! You dont lack to be in addition verbose and instead absentminded originality! The more short the better, but not going too extreme! If you want to get a full essay, pronounce it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment