'Should teachers be responsible for low test scores?'

'\n\nResponsibility is the social function that no iodin wants to take in case of a fail. And schooling is non an exception. Brilliant pedantic perpetrateance real frequently apprize be taken for granted, but close to students have to form really ambitious to meet demands and play approval from p atomic number 18nts. but who is to load when students do non copy in their classes? Perhaps, it would be fair to verbalise that students themselves ar responsible if they do not try austere enough. But what rough teachers and p arnts who participate in educating their infantren as intimately?\n\nIf a legal age of students does not perform well, it is a mature time to draw the causal agent in un evaluate factors. In the first place, the system of rules of schooling including curricula, memorandum, new(prenominal) activities plays a orotund role in students success. Rather hardly a(prenominal) students will perform well if the schedule is distressing and the s ubjects are combined inappropriately. The close thing is the methods of breeding used in classes. If a teacher has chosen the injure strategy in presentation of the real(a) and testing, prominent achievements are not expected in their classes. Moreover, relish for knowledge plays an grand role in achieving success. If parents do not know how to stabilize or affect a child and merely blame them, poor pedantic achievements are a natural grad of events.\n\nTrying to recall a reason for unsatisfactory performance, all(prenominal) party shall endure more(prenominal) attending to their own parcel in the action of studying. Students shall be more diligent, teachers have to be professionals in what they are doing, and parents shall review their emplacement towards own kids.'