Monday, February 11, 2019
Division of Labor Essay -- essays research papers
Marxs View of the Divisionof LaborThe Division of Labor is a report which has fascinated social scientists for millennia. Before the advent of modern times, philosophers and theologians concerned themselves with the implications of the idea. Plato aphorism as the ultimate form of order a community in which social functions would be rigidly separated and maintained society would be divided into definite functional groups warriors, artisans, unskilled laborers, rulers. St. Paul, in his first garner to the church at Corinth, went so far as to describe the public Church in terms of a body on that point atomic number 18 hands, feet, eyes, and all are under the head, Christ. Anyone who intends to deal seriously with the study of society must grapple with the question of the fraction of labor. Karl Marx was no exception. Marx was more than a mere economist. He was a social scientist in the full import of the phrase. The heart of his system was based on the idea of adult male prod uction. Mankind, Marx asserted, is a totally autonomous species - being, and as such man is the sole originator of the world in which he finds himself. A man cannot be delimit apart from his labor "As individuals express their life, so they are. What they are, therefore, coincides with their production, both with what they micturate and with how they produce."1 The very fact that man rationally organizes production is what distinguishes him from the sensual kingdom, according to Marx. The concept of production was a kind of intellectual "Archimedean pose" for Marx. Every sphere of valet de chambre life must be see in terms of this single idea "Religion, family, state, law, science, art, etc., are only particular(prenominal) modes of production, and fall under its general law."2 Given this total cartel on the concept of human labor, it is quite understandable why the division of labor played such an important role in the boilersuit Marxian framework. Property vs. LaborMarx had a vision of a perfect human society. In this sense, Martin Buber was absolutely correct in including a chapter on Marx in his Paths in Utopia. Marx believed in the existence of a society which preceded recorded human history. In this world, manpower experienced no sense of alienation because there was no alienated production. Somehow (and here Marx was never very clear) men fell into patterns of alienated production, and fr... ...of Revolution (Nutley, New Jersey Craig Press, 1968), p. 112. 7 German Ideology, pp. 44-45. 8 Critique of the Gotha Program (1875), in Marx-Engels Selected Works, II, p. 24. This is one of the few places in which Marx presented some picture of the post-Revolutionary world. 9 Ibid. 10 Ludwig Yon Mises, collectivism (New Haven, Conn. Yale University Press, 1922 1951), p. 164. 11 Maurice Cornforth, Marxism and the Linguistic Philosophy (New York International Publishers, 1965), p. 327. 12 German Ideology, p. 84. 13 Murray N. Rothb ard, "Left and Right The Prospects for Liberty," Left and Right, 1 (1965), p. 8. 14 "On the Jewish Question," (1843-44), in T. B. Bottomore, Karl Marx Early Writings (New York McGraw-Hill, 1964), pp. 34-40. 15 G. D. H. Cole, The Meaning of Marxism (Ann Arbor University of stat mi Press, 1948 1964), p. 249. 16 Leon Trotsky, The Revolution Betrayed (1936), quoted by F. A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (University of Chicago Press, 1944), p. 119. 17 Mises, Socialism, pp. 60-62. Reprinted with permission from The Freeman, a publication of The Foundation for Economic Education, Inc., January 1969, Vol. 19, No. 1.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment