Final Lab Report Sample

employment Per rebounded July 30, 2012 EXPERIMENT NO. 10 COMPOSITION OF POTASSIUM CHLORIDE ABSTRACT The repulse of the experiment was to look for the piece composition of the agents pledge in the bunk of thou chlorate (KClO3) and to find reveal what the residue after(prenominal) warmth system was. later on performing the experiment the researchers found out that there were about 66. 14% of yard chloride (KCl) in KClO3, and they excessively deducted that the residue was actually KCl. _____________________________________________________________________________________Introduction sum of money vision of the Element/Compound (Part)Total troop of Compound (Whole) ? century The form preceding(prenominal) is the formula used to determine the contribution composition of an individual element in a compound. In this experiment, the researchers are both going to brighten for the hypothetical percentage composition and the observational percentage composition of elements / ions. The conjectural percent composition is solved using a known formula compound and an experimental percent composition is solved using selective information identified in the experiment.The goal of this experiment is to formulate a trivial percentage error as possible, which is solved using the formula below. abstractive esteem- experimental value suppositious value ? 100 The compound that they are going to use in this experiment is KCl or potassium chlorate. Potassium chlorate, when het to advanced temperatures would form this equation 2KClO? (s) ? 2KCl (s)+3O? (g) Procedure The experiment was composed of twain ploughshares. The first trigger was for determining the percentage composition of potassium chlorate.First, the researchers made sure that the crucible, which would be used throughout the experiment, was dry, so they heated it on a the Great Compromiser triangle for 2-3 minutes. Next, they let the crucible cool down a pungency and then weighed it together wi th its spinal column. hence they added 1. 196 g of potassium chlorate into the crucible, placed its chapeau and then weighed it. After that, they heated the crucible again on the the Great Compromiser triangle for 8 minutes with its bottom 2. 5-3 inches away from the flame. They heated it for some other 10 minutes, that time adding a little bit of distance between the flame and crucible bottom.They allowed the crucible to cool for about 10 minutes. Then they reweighed the sample for 6 more minutes, cooled it and then weighed it again. In the second burst of the experiment, they took 3 screen out tubes, peerless containing a small amount of potassium chloride, one with a like amount of potassium chlorate, and one that contained a solution obtained from adding distilled water to the crucible, that was used in the first part of the experiment, and heated it for about a minute, and then they added 10 ml of distilled water to apiece and stirred.In each of the tubes, they added 5 drops of dilute (6 M) nitric acid and 5 drops of 0. 1 M silver nitrate solution, then stirred each test tube and observed carefully. Results and Discussion On the first part of the experiment, the researchers started impinge on with the crucible with the sample that weighed 37. 184 g. , after the first warming, the green goddess decreased and became 37. 093 g. , after the second heating, the mass decreased again and became 36. 787 g. , the difference between the two wasnt less than 0. 05 g. , so they had to reheat.After the third heating, the weight became 36. 779 g. , their difference was inside 0. 05 g. so no more heating is required. After calculating, the researchers found out that the theoretical percentage of oxygen in KClO3 is 39. 17% and that the experimental percentage of oxygen they got in KClO3 was 33. 86%. On the other hand they also found out that theoretical percentage of KCl in KClO3 is 60. 83% and that their experimental percentage of KCl in KClO3 was 66. 14%. a nd that the experimental attempt to get the percentage of oxygen in KClO3 had an error of 8. 3%. On the second part of the experiment when 5 drops of dilute (6 M) nitric acid and 5 drops of (0. 1 M) silver nitrate solution were added to the solution of the residue and distilled water, potassium chloride solution, and potassium chlorate solution, all of them turned cloudy with white precipitate in them which indicated that chloride ions were present which lead to the deduction that the residue was actually KCl. 1. Mass of crucible + cover 35. 988g. 2. Mass of crucible + cover + sample onward heating 37. 84 g. 3. Mass of crucible + cover + residue after 1st heating 37. 093 g. 4. Mass of crucible + cover + residue after 2nd heating 36. 787 g. 5. Mass of crucible + cover + residue after 3rd heating 36. 779 g. 6. Mass of airplane pilot sample=37. 184? 35. 988=1. 196 1. 196 g. 7. Total mass lost during heating=37. 184? 36. 779=0. 405 0. 405 g. 8. Final mass of residue=1. 196? 0. 405=0. 791 0. 791 g. 9. Experimental percent oxygen in KClO3=0. 4051. 196? 100=0. 3386? 100=33. 86% 33. 6% 10. Experimental percent KCl in KClO3=0. 7911. 196? 100=0. 6614? 100=66. 14% 66. 14% 11. Theoretical percent oxygen in KClO3=3(16. 00)39. 10+35. 45+3(16. 00)? 100=48122. 55? 100=0. 3917? 100=39. 17% 39. 17% 12. Theoretical percent KCl in KClO3=39. 10+35. 4539. 10+35. 45+3(16. 00)? 100=74. 55122. 55? 100=0. 6083? 100=60. 83% 60. 83% 13. part error in experimental % oxygen determination=60. 83-66. 1460. 83? 100=-5. 3160. 83? 100=-0. 0873? 100=8. 73% 8. 73% consequence and RecommendationAs seen above, the experimental percent gotten by the researchers wasnt that far off from the theoretical value, and they ended up with a percent error of 8. 73%. Thats not a high percent error, but in chemistry, where accuracy is very vital, that amount is already considered high. One of the factors that led them to a high percentage error was that they used a different balance for the weigh of 4 and 5 in the table. For further experimentation, the researchers suggest that only one balance would be used throughout the experiment.It is also important to honor the crucible steady so that spattering wont dislodge during heating. Because when spattering does happen, mass lost would no longer be accurate. References * adjudge Hein, MORRIS, et al. , FOUNDATIONS OF CHEMISTRY IN THE LABORATORY FOR SCIENCES (CUSTOM EDITION), 12th ed. , Singapore129809, 2009 Appendix 1. Mass of pilot light sample= (mass of the crucible + cover + sample before heating) (mass of crucible + cover) 2. Total mass lost during heating= (mass of the crucible + cover + sample before heating) (mass of the crucible + cover + after 3rd heating) 3.Final mass of residue= mass of original sample total mass lost during heating 4. Experimental percent oxygen in KClO3=total mass lost during heatingmass of original sample? 100 5. Experimental percent KCl in KClO3=final mass of residuemass of original sample? 100 6. Theoretical percent oxygen in KClO3=molar mass of O? molar mass of KClO 100 7. Theoretical percent KCl in KClO3=molar mass of KClmolar mass of KClO 100 8. Percent error in experimental % oxygen determination=theoretical value-experimental valuetheoretical value? 100